Skronker

June 1, 2009

$3.7 million virginity bid falls through. Boobies.

Filed under: Uncategorized — elizabeth bromstein @ 7:41 pm

A young woman who is going by the name of Natalie Dylan is auctioning off her virginity and was allegedly offered $3.7 million for it (so she SAYS). But it seems the 39-year-old Australian businessman has had to back out of the deal because his wife was unhappy with the arrangement — which is not wholly unreasonable.

And this guy is only 39, which means he’s not even having a midlife crisis yet, an event in a man’s life that usually means blowing the vacation money on a flashy sports car, motorcycle, boat or something else transportation related. Women get botox and facelifts. It’s the way things should be.

 If this guy is dropping (or trying to drop) 3.7 million bucks on an intact hymen as a regular, everyday, impulse buy, what’s he going to do the day he looks in the mirror, sees his hair is going, and starts wondering what it’s all for and where the rest of his life is going? What’s he going to buy………

…….

…….

 …OK, in trying to invent/find some outrageous thing he could buy I Googled “Sex Island” and discovered that there is a gay porno movie called Lost on Sex Island which, according to the gay website TheGuide.com, is the porn version of The Island of Dr. Moreaux.

 ”In The Island of Dr. Moreau, a mad scientist turned animals into men; in Lost on Sex Island, a Moreau-like figure called Dr. Vixen (Damian Ford) turns men into sex pigs.” The reviewer says the film is “watchable” but that the “continuity goes haywire.”

 Anyway, back to virginity auctions, I have no strong opinions on them one way or the other, as long – OBVIOUSLY – as the hymen in question is attached to a willing adult party. It seems like a great way to make a lot of money and I kind of wish I’d thought of it back when I had some of that to offer. I’m guessing “slightly used married virgin” doesn’t have the same appeal.

Not all virginities go for such high amounts (if that was indeed a real offer). Italian born German student Alina Percea got just $18 000 for hers and last I heard Germany was talking about taking her 79% on it – a 50% prostitution tax plus a 19% value added tax. That is totally highway robbery. Hardly worth it in the end.

Then there was that creepy and clearly incredibly unstable 18-year-old British lesbian, Rosie Reid, who let hers go for 8, 400 pounds to some poor schmuck who did the deflowering while Rosie’s girlfriend stayed in the room. Then she told the newspapers it was “horrible” and that afterwards she and the girlfriend “just cried and cried.” Okey dokey Chiquita. You don’t need professional help at all.

As for Natalie, I feel the need to point out that her cherry has been on the block for, like, EVER at this point, since September 2008. When is she actually going to do this thing? Maybe you should take whatever the second highest bid was, before people stop taking you seriously. And stay off those horses and away from any heavy lifting. One false move and  (as someone on another blog that I now cannot find to link to pointed out) today’s purest snowflake is tomorrow’s worthless whore trash. All that financial opportunity out the window. I’d be afraid to even sneeze.

The 22-year-old is hocking her goodies via the Nevada Bunny Ranch brothel.

Don’t know much about real live brothels? Me neither. This one looks pretty nice. I kind of wish they had a restaurant where I could just go and eat a meal and hang out but then I think that sort of tourism is a bit tacky and probably somewhat unsophisticated. After all, it’s a whorehouse, not a zoo and gawking at the ladies seems somewhat crass. Still…I’d like to visit but not “party” as they put it. Of course, I was most inerested in a price list and they don’t have one on the website as the girls are “independent contractors.”

I did find pricing for the Chicken Ranch, another Nevada brothel…on Wikipedia no less. It says ” prices start at $100 (the unofficial house minimum), but the average amount for one hour of intercourse and oral sex is about $400.” But I think this is pretty cheap and that Bunny Ranch prices can probably range into the thousands and thousands of dollars.

All this is making me think of the Best Little Whorehouse in Texas. So, here’s Dolly Parton singing Little Bitty Pissant Country Place. Whee! Yeehaw.

 

February 9, 2009

Eileen dodged a bullet there if you ask me

Filed under: Uncategorized — elizabeth bromstein @ 5:05 am

Look! The font is bigger! I don’t know why but it is. Hurray.

Anyhoo. Work had me Googling “crossdressing rock stars” last week, and did you ever wonder whatever happened to Kevin Rowland from Dexy’s Midnight Runners?

“Did those guys ever do anything besides Come On Eileen?” a friend asked, as well she might.

Well, yes, as a matter of fact, they did. They had a hit with a single called Geno and then there’s whatever song it is they’re performing in this clip of The Young Ones that I think of whenever I hear Come on Eileen, which I always imagine is the song in the clip, even though it’s not. The Young Ones often had musical guests, like Motorhead (fuck the umaut, I can’t be bothered) and The Damned.

Since the eighties Kevin has been recording off and on and in 1999 he released a little gem of an album entitled My Beauty. Here is a video single from it. You can thank me later.

 

I have no idea what’s up. Sorry.

Eff you Cheerios. I’ll have the porterhouse.

Filed under: Uncategorized — elizabeth bromstein @ 4:58 am

On Yahoo today there was a news story about this guy, Mark Rudov, who hates this Cheerios ad (I don’t know anything about the guy except that he hates the ad and therefore do not necessarily otherwise endorse him). And may I say? FINALLY. I hate this ad and have been saying to anyone who happens to be sitting near me whenever it airs – usually and probably only ever my husband – that the woman is an abusive bitch who deserves to smacked. If a man were talking to a woman like that everyone would be crying domestic abuse. But we’re supposed to think this is funny? I dunno. That just seems so very wrong to me. Here’s the ad.

 
She’s awful right? Interestingly, in Canada it airs without the dubbing and with the original British accents. Maybe people in the United States are confused or put off by accents in the same way that they are confused or put off by the word “philosopher” which is presumably why Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone was released in the U.S. as Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.

But really. Why was that? Not being a student of the All Americans Are Idiots school of thought, I’ve often wondered who decides these things and what the reasoning is behind them. So, it turns out it was the American publisher who changed the book title. Did they do a market study? I can’t find out. I did stumble across an explanation of what the philosopher’s stone actually is though, something that had – probably surprisingly – never occurred to me to wonder about.

According to (the oft erroneous) Wikipedia it’s a “legendary alchemical tool, supposedly capable of turning base metals into gold; it was also sometimes believed to be an elixir of life, useful for rejuvenation and possibly for achieving immortality. For a long time, it was the most sought-after goal in Western alchemy. In the view of alchemists like Sir Isaac Newton and Nicolas Flamel familiarity with the philosopher’s stone would bring enlightenment upon the maker and conclude the Great Work.”

Nicolas Flamel is mentioned in the Harry Potter books as a pal of Dumbledore and said to have lived to 665 thanks to the stone. In real life he was apparently a medieval scrivener and crack alchemist.  Though his dates are given as approx. 1330-1418, word is that he and his wife achieved immortality. But they no longer live in the same house they occupied in the 14th Century. It’s now the oldest house in Paris and the ground floor is a restaurant, L’Auberge Nicolas Flamel. The décor is ghastly but the porterhouse steak with morels sounds awesome.

January 14, 2009

Hey you got your god on my rock. You got your rock on my god.

Filed under: Uncategorized — elizabeth bromstein @ 8:54 pm

My job had me surfing the web today looking for “Rock Gods.” This is because I was commenting on a UK poll of 4000 people in which people voted Freddie Mercury the Ultimate Rock God. The list was as follows:

Top 10 Ultimate Rock Gods
1. Freddie Mercury
2. Elvis Presley
3. Jon Bon Jovi
4. David Bowie
5. Jimi Hendrix
6. Ozzy Osbourne
7. Kurt Cobain
8. Slash
9. Bono
10. Mick Jagger

Obviously it’s a joke as there are so many things wrong with it it’s hard to know where to start, the lack of David Coverdale being the most obvious. And you can’t have a list of ROCK GODS without ROBERT PLANT on it. He is THE rock god. THIS HAS ME CONFUSED SO I THINK I’LL JUST PUT THE CAPS LOCK KEY DOWN FOR A LITTLE WHILE. THERE I FEEL A BIT BETTER.

Anyhoodle, while googling around on the subject of “rock gods” I came across this question on Yahoo answers:

 

Do you think that God made rock n roll for a reason? Maybe it was corrupted along the way….?

 

Everything is made for a reason…

 

There has to be a reason to rock n roll or heavy metal. And its not just Christian Rock.

 

What? Whoa. I…I don’t…man.

 

The best thing about this question is that it’s marked as “resolved.” So, there you go.

 

January 10, 2009

Madge spreads and a horse dances

Filed under: Entertainment, Random Stuff, pop culture — elizabeth bromstein @ 6:18 pm

So my friend emailed me this incredibly amusing pic of Madonna along with the accompanying post on The Superficial that says “Here’s Madonna in the latest Louis Vuitton ad, and what the decaying hell are these people smoking? I seriously doubt anyone is looking at this photo and thinking to themselves “Oh, wow, a vag-cophagus. I suddenly need a new handag.” Unless Louis Vuitton is aggressively courting the elusive “Gay Paleontologist” market. In which case, jackpot!”

0106_madonna_louisvuitton_00

Ha! Vag-cophagus! That guy is funny.

 

Has anyone noticed lately that Madge has a very strange obsession with showing people her crotch? I give you exhibit b.

madonna-throne-concert-gal

 

And exhibit c.

madonnahardcandy

 

Jesus Jones woman. I’m all for amateur strip club roofie night at the old folk’s home but I’m not sure I’d use the evidence as promo shots.

 

 

With the oddly graying skin tone and hardening but shrinking body, she is starting to look seriously freaky.

 

 

I’ll be honest, Madonna scares me. I don’t know why but she just seems sort of evil and soulless. I sometimes think she goes home to her mansion, wherever that may be right now, strips out of her human skin and dives into a bloody pool of human bodies where she feeds all night. Her skin is slowly turning to stone just like Meryl Streep in Death Becomes Her and eventually she’s just going to be a spread legged marble statue (marble is a stone right? Watch me be wrong about that) sitting on sale in a antique shop.

 

 

Guy Ritchie will walk in and think “That looks familiar but I can’t quite place it…”

 

 

It’s weird that I hate Madonna so much since I LOVED her so much when I was younger, and I still like the old Madonna – Like A Virgin, Borderline – but there’s just something that resonates off her that repels me.

 

A friend of mine feels the same way about Grace Jones and says “It’s like she’s on some frequency that makes me crazy.”

 

I feel the same way about Drew Barrymore and Adam Sandler. The latter makes me feel bad because according to this guy Adam is the nicest guy in Hollywood.

 

I also have a SERIOUS problem with Diablo Cody, the screenwriter behind Juno, which I never saw and won’t see. First of all because I read Cody’s memoir Candy Girl and it was such a self congratulating pile of gobbige I can’t ever bring myself to experience anything by her again. Second because I heard Juno was that year’s Little Miss Sunshine and I hated that smug, whimsical, crappy two hours I will never get back. Third because everyone made SUCH A BIG DEAL about the fact that Diablo Cody (whose real and far less dumb name is Brooke something) used to be a stripper (for ONE year!). That film was marketed largely on that sole fact, as though it’s somehow remarkable that she once took her clothes off for a living and can actually DO SOMETHING ELSE. (And I am NOT bitter in any way shape or form because I also used to be a stripper, for far longer, and can’t believe the sort of mileage she’s getting out of it. OK?)

 

“She was a stripper! And she writes!” People were so impressed by this. They might as well have been saying “She’s a HORSE! And she can write!”

 

Anyway, I don’t think she actually can write. But if she were a horse I might think what she has written is more impressive, you know because she was a horse and all. So far I haven’t heard of any horses who can write but there are horses that can do this. Look! He’s dancing! How cool is that? Almost as good as the dancing horse is how excited the very proper British announcers are getting. At 4:06 you can hear one of them grunt with pleasure.

 

Also, it is totally a coincidence that this routine starts out to an instrumental version of Grace Jones’ Slave to the Rhythm. I swear.    

 

 

November 10, 2008

Are we not men? We are holograms! And one man a capella video choirs.

Filed under: Uncategorized — elizabeth bromstein @ 6:57 am

Today discovered the wild world of one man a capella choir video performances. This guy – Vance Perry – found via Fark, is awesome. Digging the Beach Boys-ish harmonies – is that a classic gospel arrangement? The best part about the whole thing is the fact that he decided to do it in the first place. Well, maybe not the best part but a good part. First you have to say to yourself, “You know what I think I’ll do today? I think I’ll record Joshua Fit the Battle of Jericho 8 times in four different parts, mix it and make it into a video,” instead of “You know what I think I’ll do today? See if there’s any cheese in the fridge.” That in itself is amazing. If you ask me.

 

 

 

Vance isn’t the only solo chorus out there. There’s also this guy, Loucapella.

 

This stuff wouldn’t be nearly as good on a live stage, though, which is unfortunate since that’s where the large part of the money in the music biz is these days. They might be OK as is on a larger screen, like a short film, for say 20 minutes or so. Or, they could get some really cool holograms going. So, it would look like the guy was standing on stage next to himself. I don’t know how easy, difficult or effective this would be. But had a bounce around to see how far we’ve come in the hologram department – apparently the CNN election night attempts were a tad disappointing, though I missed them myself — and found this. It’s long…but you get the idea

 

Those guys are HOLOGRAMS! There’s also this clip of Virgin’s Richard Branson. I’d say we’re doing quite well in the hologram department. Keep up the good work men!

 

 

November 3, 2008

Comeback. I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

Filed under: Entertainment, Random Stuff, music, pop culture — elizabeth bromstein @ 5:56 am

 

 

I’m perplexed and annoyed by the current common usage of the term “comeback.” Take, for example, Britney Spears’ Womanizer. Why does the media keep referring to this single as a “comeback”? Britney released an album LAST YEAR. And three singles. One of which made it into the top ten. Yes, her latest single is her first #1 hit since Hit Me Baby One More Time (even though Piece of Me truly deserved to do better than it did – That is a great song and a far superior one to Womanizer), which may be why people are referring to this as a “comeback” but they also referred to the previous album as a “comeback.”

 

To come back don’t you first have to go away? B-Spea never went anywhere. Well, maybe LaLa Land, but the cameras were with her every step of the way. So, it’s like she never left. 

 

Is this just lazy writing and reporting or a result or the acceleration of culture or both?

 

Now, if Chinese Democracy (due, Nov. 23, 2008) is any good, THAT will be a comeback. Guns N’ Roses being one of my favourite bands of all time, I’m  NERVOUS about the release and can’t help but think it might have been better to wait for Chinese democracy to become a reality before making Chinese Democracy a reality.

 

No matter what Axl does he can’t win. Unless this album is truly amazing in a way that I can’t imagine, and the tracks I’ve heard don’t seem to indicate that this is the case, the critics are going to rip him to shreds. And I just love him too much (God help me I do!) not be a little upset by this.

 

Other examples of albums that have been referred to as “comebacks”

 

AC/DC, Black Ice (2008): It has been 8 years since the release of Stiff Upper Lip but is that not a reasonable amount of time to take between records for dudes in their 60s? And they didn’t drop off the radar and have played Toronto in the interim.

Is it a comeback? No.

 

Eminem, Relapse (due – Dec 1, 2008): It has only been four years since Eminem took a hiatus. But he was such a force on the hip hop scene that his absence was notable. I often said to myself “I wonder what Eminem is up to.” Therefore,

Is it a comeback? Yes.

 

Lily Allen, It’s Not Me, It’s You (due – Feb. 10, 2009): Lily’s Smile came out in 2006 so, that’s 3 years between records but she’s been in the tabloids so much I feel like she’s in my living room. And she did a collaboration with Common.

Is it a comeback? No.

 

Michael Jackson, maybe releasing an album in 2009: Michael looks pretty illin’ these days and I’m not sure I buy the promise of an album but word is that he is recording or has recorded one in Vegas. If he does make it, chances that it will be any good are impossible to estimate. He last toured in 1996 and last released a studio album in 2001. Michael has, however, remained in the news as we wait for his bits to fall off and try to remember the guy who recorded Thriller.

Will it be a comeback? How does your cat always know to lie on the page you were reading? 

 

Grace Jones, Hurricane, (Oct. 27, 2008): I have a friend who was very seriously considering embarking on a documentary project to find out what Grace Jones is up to these days. When I told him she was releasing a comeback album he said, “So much for that idea.” Her last record came out in 1989. She’s 60.

Is it a comeback? Yes.

 

And, in the spirit of skronker, let’s have a look at Grace, shall we? We shall. Welcome to my arty. Live in France much? She must live in France. Psst. Pay close attention to the 3:25 mark. It’s Jennifer Beals!  

 

 

 

 

 

October 30, 2008

Internet good. Heroin bad.

Filed under: Entertainment, Random Stuff, pop culture — elizabeth bromstein @ 7:12 pm

 

 

 

A report on Yahoo’s tech guide says technology is changing our brains.

 

“The Internet is not just changing the way people live but altering the way our brains work with a neuroscientist arguing this is an evolutionary change which will put the tech-savvy at the top of the new social order.

 

Gary Small, a neuroscientist at UCLA in California who specializes in brain function, has found through studies that Internet searching and text messaging has made brains more adept at filtering information and making snap decisions.”

 

Seems obvious no? It also goes on to say we have to find a balance between the web and the real world so you don’t become AN ADDICTED LOSER WITH  NO FRIENDS IN THE OUTSIDE WORLD ETCETERA ETCETERA!!!!

 

But of course the Internet is making us smarter in some ways and dumber in others. I’ll bet our information processing capacity grows each minute while our emotional intelligence and conversational skills plummet into Satan’s toilet.   

 

A pretty good book related to this topic is Everything Bad is Good for You, by Stephen Johnson. In it the author takes on people who turn their noses up at modern entertainment, and go around snuffling about how reality shows and such are useless mindmelting crap then goes on to illustrate (sometimes even with CHARTS!) how video games, reality TV and complicated dramas like 24 are making our minds sharper and more sophisticated.

 

Just so we’re clear, the title is misleading. Not everything bad is good for you. Heroin is bad for you. A book that illustrates this rather eloquently is Jessica Dimmock’s The Ninth Floor. Dimmock, a photographer, documents almost three years in the lives of an assortment of addicts living on the ninth floor of a Manhattan apartment building. I saw the exhibit in New York. You really need the book to get the full effect. It’s arresting, disturbing, disconcertingly compelling.

 

 

 

 

From the book jacket:

 

 

 

“The 3 bedroom apartment was leased by Joe Smith, 68. In the 70’s Joe had been a player in the downtown art scene. Joe subleased a room to a young hustler named Joey; soon Joey was joined by his brother Mike, Mike’s girlfriend Jesse, and many others. When I met this group in the fall of 2004 Joe no longer had a bedroom in his apartment. He stayed on the couch in hopes of gaining rent. In exchange for use of his apartment, people contributed money at first, then just bags of heroin, several cigarettes, a teaspoon of methadone or a daily beer. Unable to inject himself, Joe grew dependent on these young residents to shoot him up.”

 

 

Turns out there’s also a video. I had posted a clip from YouTube but it has since been removed. But the full length video is here. Jessica Dimmock’s website is here 

 

 

October 21, 2008

Pete Burns. Yikes.

Filed under: Entertainment, Random Stuff, music, pop culture — elizabeth bromstein @ 8:32 pm

Ruhmember Pete Burns from Dead or Alive? Not a bad looking guy right?

 

 

Well, I don’t know where I’ve been – because he was apparently on Big Brother so this look isn’t news per se – but it wasn’t until pretty recently that I learned that the once rather chisel faced male Pete now looks like a rather unfortunate female Pete.

 

You know, like one of those girls who moved to Hollywood from Cornfritter VA, (pop. 534) all full of big screen dreams of becoming a serious actress but wound up stripping/hooking/doing porn/all three until bagging an available self made gazillionaire, landing the role of trophy wife and going berserk on the plastic surgery because she was a) bored out of her skull sitting by a Beverly Hills pool sipping Harvey Wallbangers all day and b) terrified Woodford Moneybags Esq. was going to ditch her for a younger, hotter model and she’d have to go back to smoking poles for a living at the age of 56.

 

But THEN Woodford got kind of grossed out by how far she’d gone to look younger and how terribly it all turned out even though it was ALL TO PLEASE HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE (though she still became sort of a frigid bitch after the first year of matrimonial bliss and they hadn’t done it in ages) because he made it clear from the beginning that her beauty was immensely important to him and he was also quite disgusted with himself over the whole situation so he DID go out and replace her with that younger, less vacuum packed and pumped version who will become the fourth Mrs. Moneybags (Number one, shared a basement apartment with him in the early days until she realized he was no longer the idealistic, romantic dreamer she once loved and she didn’t even KNOW HIM ANYMORE! And number two took the kids and ran off with his former business partner and best friend).

 

So Mrs. Moneybags number three finds herself living in a one bedroom apartment wishing she had gotten a goddamn prenup, getting even more surgery and trolling the hotel bars in the hopes of landing herself another rich husband and so, she winds up looking like this.

 

Except THAT is Pete Burns. Word is that he’s getting a settlement from the plastic surgeon who botched his lip job and he could get as much as $2million. The scariest part of this story: “Mr Burns, 49, has said: ‘It has taken away my life and my career. I saw doctors in London who said the only option was to amputate my lips. I was suicidal.’” AMPUTATE HIS LIPS???  Yikes.

 

Here’s what he looks like performing these days.

 

 

The song was apparently covered by Jessica Simpson. Odd. There was another cover version by Dope, which is apparently often mistakenly attributed to Marilyn Manson and featured in the movie American Psycho.

 

Speaking of which, American Psycho was the inspiration for Kanye West’s recent video Love Lockdown. What? You don’t remember the African tribal warrior scenes in American Psycho? What’s wrong with you?

 

October 15, 2008

Thank goodness Nena is not dead and has anyone seen that orgy scene in Caligula?

Filed under: Entertainment, Random Stuff, music, pop culture — elizabeth bromstein @ 1:43 am

Cruising Fark.com, came across this video of Nena and Kim Wilde, from 2003. It’s a fabulous Euro synth pop overload with Nena’s outfit clearly courtesy of Das Leather Barn and maybe some suggested middle-aged pseudo Euro-lesbian suggestion (or maybe I’m imagining that). This is what happens when the women who brought you Kids in America and 99 Luftballoons hit their mid forties. And Kim Wilde is still pretty adorable.

 

But here’s the thing about this discovery. I was CERTAIN that Nena was dead. I have no idea where I got this idea and am pleased as punch to learn that she is not but why did I think that??? It’s so weird.

 

My husband thinks maybe I got her confused with Falco, who died in a car crash in 1998. “You know,” he said. “They’re German and they each have one name.” But I’ve always known the difference between Nena and Falco.

 

So, I started thinking about which eighties stars have died. I know I wouldn’t confuse Nena with Robert Palmer but I did come up with Laura Branigan, who died of a brain aneurism in 2004. And I feel as though I thought Nena died about four years ago and, while I didn’t have any idea HOW she was supposed to have died I think maybe I thought it was a brain aneurism.

 

So, I’m thinking maybe someone got Laura Branigan confused with Nena in conversation and told me the news which I would have had no reason to doubt and I probably would have thought “Wow! Laura Branigan AND Nena? Two eighties pop stars and two brain aneurisms? That’s so odd!” when really it was just a mistake. Because I really can’t think of any other plausible explanation. Unless someone was just messing with me, like when, in the early nineties my boyfriend at the time told me Annie Lennox had died, just to see if I’d buy it. I never got the purpose of that experiment.

 

Of course, I had to look up the year Laura Branigan died and on her Wikipedia page read that Self Control was originally banned from MTV in 1984 for being too sexy.

 

A verification search took me to her memorial site which states that Self Control was the FIRST video to be banned from MTV. I dunno about that. I’d always thought that the first video to be banned from MTV was Duran Duran’s Girls on Film in 1981, which makes more sense because A) it was earlier and B) there’s boobs.

 

Apparently there are people out there who believe Cher’s If I Could Turn Back Time is also a contender for 1st banned video. There was some censorship due to some outfit issues (she’s wearing fishnet biker shorts with attached garters and a leather crotch strap/nipple suit. It’s not difficult to see why she’s such a drag icon but it is amusing to watch the sailors go bananasin their little white sujits) but I still think Duran Duran holds the honour. 

 

There might still have been boobs in the original Self Control video. Apparently an edited version was aired. I don’t know if this is the original or the edited version.

 

 

One interesting thing though is that the director seemed to think covering the sound studio floor with black rubber would make for a convincing enough “street in the night.” It’s one step up from taping down garbage bags.

 

That director, interestingly, was William Friedkin, director of The Exorcist and The French Connection. Friedkin made his directorial debut with Good Times, a 1967 musical starring Sonny and Cher (in addition to a 70s sitcom and a Kool & The Gang album).  

 

Of course, we won’t find Self Control overly sexy these days. I think it might have been the “orgy” scene that was deemed objectionable, which is amusing because it’s just a bunch of dancers in leotards rolling all over each other.

 

Speaking of orgies, this sent me looking to see if I could find the orgy scene from the 1979 movie Caligula, starring Malcolm McDowell, written by Gore Vidal and directed by Penthouse founder Bob Guccione. I had heard all about this filthy scene in which people are giving real tromboners but the copy I rented must have been an edited version because it was missing (there are 13 or so different edits floating around). So I went looking for it online but came up with nothing. Found this though. Just an average afternoon for Caligula — beheading your subjects with a GIANT MACHINE while your wife sits quietly by on her leash.

 

 

The movie is kind of interesting for the set design, cast and grotesqueries but if you want a truly excellent portayal of the mad emperor see the 1973 BBC series, I Claudius. Now THAT is a brilliant production. I watched all 13 episodes in 2 days. Then watched them all again a year later.  

 

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.